|
There is deep taxonomical confusion around the genera Metzia Jordan & Thompson 1914 and Rasborinus Oshima 1920. Correct identification of specimens is difficult. The fact, even the quite helpful and reliable fish species database Fishbase at www.fishbase.com shows a picture of Metzia formosae (herein called under its junior synonym Rasborinus formosae) in their species fact sheet of Metzia lineata. This is an example of the comprehensive misunderstanding of the relationships within this species’ group.
The story: Jordan and Thompson created the genus Metzia in 1914 using Acheilognathus mesembrinum Jordan & Evermann 1902 as the type species. Thus the new name for Acheilognathus mesembrinum is Metzia mesembrinum (Jordan & Evermann 1902). Mesembrinum derived from Greek and is a noun in apposition and therefore do not need to follow the feminine gender of the genus Metzia. Apart from Acheilognathus mesembrinum Jordan and Thompson did not enclose any other species in Metzia, so that the generic status was monotypic at this time.
Six years later, in 1920, the Japanese ichthyologist Oshima created the genus Rasborinus defining R. takakii as the type species.
Following KOTTELAT (2001b), who compared the original descriptions and figures, Metzia mesembrinum and Rasborinus takakii are conspecific, means R. takakii is a junior synonym of M. mesembrinum. They are one and the same species. Since a type species defines the characteristics for the entire genus, means for every species belonging to this genus, all the species of former Rasborinus should be placed into Metzia. The genus Rasborinus should be a junior synonym of Metzia (see also Berg, 1932; Myers, 1934).
|